How Much of Your Net Worth Should Be in Real Estate? The India HNI Benchmark

A data-driven benchmark for India’s HNI and UHNI real estate allocation, drawn from the Knight Frank India Wealth Report and Kotak Private’s Top of the Pyramid report.

Minimalist glass-tower architecture, representative of the institutional-grade real assets increasingly favored inside India’s HNI real estate allocation.

The Two Real Numbers Behind an Old Question

Every wealth manager in Mumbai has fielded the same question from a client who just sold a business or closed a large liquidity event: how much of net worth in real estate is enough, and how much is too much? For decades the answer was cultural instinct rather than data. Two recent industry surveys finally put hard numbers behind it.

Knight Frank India’s Wealth Report puts the figure at 32 percent of total wealth held in residential real estate among Indian ultra-high-net-worth individuals, defined as those with a net worth above 30 million dollars (roughly ₹250 crore). Kotak Private’s Top of the Pyramid report, the twentieth edition of a survey run with EY across 150 Ultra-HNIs, lands close by at 29 percent of the average portfolio. Two independent methodologies, one converging answer: India’s wealthiest households are holding roughly three in every ten rupees of net worth in real estate.

That is not a trivial concentration. It is also not accidental. It reflects a deliberate, if rarely quantified, view among India’s HNI and UHNI population that property remains the most trusted long-duration store of value available to them.

Ask a private banker how much of net worth in real estate is normal for an Indian HNI client, and the honest answer used to be “somewhere between a third and a lot more, depending on the family.” These two reports are the first time that instinct has been pinned to a specific, sourced range rather than left as anecdote passed between advisors.

Where India’s Net Worth in Real Estate Actually Sits

The Kotak Private data breaks the real estate allocation down further, and the split matters more than the headline number. Commercial real estate is now preferred by 45 percent of Ultra-HNIs surveyed, ahead of residential property at 33 percent. Five years ago that ranking would likely have been reversed.

The shift toward commercial exposure tracks a simple yield argument. A well-let Grade-A office asset in a market like Bandra Kurla Complex, or a warehousing park on a logistics corridor spanning a few hundred thousand square feet (tens of thousands of square meters), throws off a rental yield that a residential apartment in the same city rarely matches. Residential real estate in India has historically traded on capital appreciation and lifestyle utility; commercial real estate is increasingly being underwritten on cash yield, the same discipline institutional investors apply to any income-producing asset.

Equities remain close behind in the same survey, at 32 percent of the average Ultra-HNI portfolio, with 89 percent of respondents favoring individual stock selection over funds. Real estate and equities are, in effect, running neck and neck as the two dominant sleeves of Indian UHNI wealth, a very different picture from a decade ago when property was the default and equities the satellite position.

The REIT and InvIT Route: Exposure Without the Illiquidity

Direct property ownership is not the only way India’s wealthy are expressing this allocation. REITs are now the preferred vehicle for 38 percent of Ultra-HNIs seeking real estate exposure, and InvITs for another 21 percent, according to the same Kotak Private data. That is a meaningful minority choosing a listed, liquid instrument over a physical asset with a title deed and a tenant to manage.

The logic is straightforward once you separate the asset class from the ownership structure — a distinction that increasingly defines UHNI portfolio allocation in India. A family that already holds 29 to 32 percent of net worth in physical property, much of it illiquid by nature, has a genuine incentive to take incremental real estate exposure through REITs and InvITs rather than another direct purchase. It adds diversification across properties and geographies inside the same balance-sheet line item, without adding another asset that cannot be sold in a week if capital is suddenly needed elsewhere.

This is also where India’s UHNI households increasingly resemble their global peers, and where structures like private estates and other alternative asset-class holdings fit into the same diversification logic as REITs and InvITs. Nearly 14 percent of Indian UHNI residential portfolios now sit outside India, and the average Indian UHNI owns 2.57 homes (roughly 2 to 3 properties), with 28 percent renting out a second home rather than leaving it vacant. Real estate, in other words, is being run as a managed portfolio of assets, not a single trophy purchase.

What This Means for Your Own Allocation

A benchmark is not a mandate. The honest reading of the 29 to 32 percent figure is that it describes what India’s wealthiest households currently hold, not what any individual family should target. Genuine portfolio construction still has to start from an investor’s own liquidity needs, time horizon, and existing concentration, not from a survey average.

That said, the benchmark is useful in two specific ways. First, it gives a family office or a private banking client a real number to test their own allocation against, rather than relying on the vague sense that “a lot of wealthy Indians hold property.” Second, the shift toward commercial assets, REITs, and InvITs inside that 29 to 32 percent band is itself the more important signal: the composition of India’s HNI real estate allocation is professionalizing faster than the headline percentage is moving.

For a family already well above the 32 percent mark, sitting predominantly in residential property, the data suggests less “sell real estate” and more “diversify within real estate,” toward commercial yield and listed structures that do not require adding another illiquid line item to the balance sheet. For a family meaningfully under the benchmark, the same data is a signal that the market’s most sophisticated capital sees room to keep building this allocation, not a warning to avoid it.

A Simple Way to Test Your Own Number

The practical exercise is short. Add up every property held, at current market value, and divide by total net worth across all asset classes, including equities, cash, private business equity, and gold. That single ratio is the honest starting point for asking how much of net worth in real estate is appropriate for your own household, measured against the 29 to 32 percent band rather than against a neighbor’s anecdote.

The second step is qualitative: within that real estate number, what share is commercial versus residential, direct versus listed through REITs and InvITs, and domestic versus international. Two families can both sit at 30 percent of net worth in real estate and carry very different risk profiles depending entirely on that internal composition, as the Knight Frank Wealth Report findings make clear when read alongside the Kotak Private data. The percentage is the headline; the composition is the actual risk being taken.

The QREST View

The most useful number in this entire discussion is not 29 or 32 percent. It is the fact that two separate, independently run surveys landed within three points of each other. That convergence is what turns an anecdote into a working benchmark, and it is precisely the kind of primary-source data point this briefing exists to surface for readers who are allocating real capital, not browsing listings.

This piece is analytical commentary drawn from the Knight Frank India Wealth Report and Kotak Private’s Top of the Pyramid report, and is intended for QREST’s institutional readership. It is not personalized investment or financial advice. Any allocation decision should be made in consultation with a qualified wealth advisor who can weigh your specific liquidity needs, tax position, and existing concentration.

Frequently Asked Questions